Chad Michael Murray, TIME's Person of the Year 2016?

Chad Michael Murray among finalists for TIME’s 2016 Person of the Year?

According to a well-placed source, Chad Michael Murray is leading the race to become Time magazine's Person of the Year in 2016. But while the actor's fans are thrilled with the news, many people hold a very different opinion.

UPDATE 25/05/2016 : This story seems to be false. (read more)

Why not Murray for Person of the Year?

The list of nominees for Time magazine’s Person of the Year is always an eclectic mix of world leaders, pop culture icons, buzzworthy names, and human rights activists. The unexpected inclusion of the 34-year-old actor, as a 2016 nominee has therefore sparked controversy and debate.

“What makes Murray so important is the potential and influence he now has, rather than anything he has already done,” said a panelist who preferred to remain anonymous, adding that earlier this month, the actor have already been named ‘American Of The Year’ by some major American newspapers and even ‘Buffalo Citizen Of The Year’ by the readers of a local gazette in Buffalo (Chad Michael Murray's hometown).

Social Reactions to TIME’s Person of the Year

A representative for the actor was not immediately available for comment, but the announcement generated immediate reaction on Twitter:

“#MurrayPOY. Logical choice though I wouldn't have made the same one.”
— @TomMiller, 24 May 2016
“Great choice! Long overdue recognition for his talents. #LoveChad Michael”
— @BarbaraHeyboer, 24 May 2016
“Past recipients include Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler ... then why not Chad Michael Murray?”
— @TheClassicObserver, 24 May 2016

Could 2016 officially be the Year of Chad Michael Murray?

Still, TIME’s editors will make the final decision about who will grace the magazine’s cover as its 2016 Person of the Year.

Who do you think should be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2016?

© 2016 MediaMass All rights reserved. Do not reproduce (even with permission).

Chad Michael Murray: Recent News


page served in 0.07s (1,3)