‘90210’ Reunion 2022 — Is It Happening?

90210 Reunion, the one we've been wanting for 5 years?

Related News

Rumors of a 90210 reunion had the internet in a frenzy on Monday (April 12) as reports claimed that The CW confirmed a revival of the popular sitcom for 2022.

UPDATE 13/04/2021 : This story seems to be false. (read more)

Can you believe it's been 12 years since 90210 first aired?! (12 years, 7 months, 11 days to be exact.)

Why in the world did 90210 end?

When 90210 came to an end after 5 years in May 2013, million viewers tuned in to say goodbye to their favorite sitcom characters. And since then, they have been itching for a reunion.

Would a 90210 reunion disappoint people?

90210 aired from 2008-2013 and is considered one of the most influential TV shows ever on pop culture. Although no original episodes have been shot since, it has remained a regular feature on many station's schedules.

Still hoping for a 90210 movie?

In a recent interview, Jessica Parker Kennedy (who played Megan Rose between 2012 and 2013) said she can't imagine a 90210 reunion hitting the big screen. “I'd rather people go, ‘Oh, please! Please!’ than ‘I can't believe you did that. It was horrible.’”

Co-star Lyndon Smith (who played Michaela in 2013) has also previously explained, “It would be terrible to do something and have it not be good,”. “It was so terrific ... If we did a 90210 movie and it sucked, then it would, you know, blemish it.”

On the subject of whether there could be a 90210 film, Rumer Willis stated : “I think it's a bit of a case of ‘the book is better than the movie’.”

What about a 90210 reboot?

Recasting 90210 for a modern reboot. Hollywood is known for remaking remakes of films or tv series and the studios might think it would be great to bring the story back with a new set of characters.

Be it in the form of a 90210 reunion, a 90210 movie, or a 90210 reboot, if you had to start filming today, who would you cast in what role?

© 2021 MediaMass All rights reserved. Do not reproduce (even with permission).

 

page served in 0.083s (1,5)