‘Lost’ Reunion 2023 — Is It Happening?

Lost Reunion, the one we've been wanting for 6 years?

Related News

Rumors of a Lost reunion had the internet in a frenzy on Sunday (January 16) as reports claimed that ABC confirmed a revival of the popular sitcom for 2023.

UPDATE 17/01/2022 : This story seems to be false. (read more)

Can you believe it's been 17 years since Lost first aired?! (17 years, 3 months, 26 days to be exact.)

Why in the world did Lost end?

When Lost came to an end after 6 years in May 2010, million viewers tuned in to say goodbye to their favorite sitcom characters. And since then, they have been itching for a reunion.

Would a Lost reunion disappoint people?

Lost aired from 2004-2010 and is considered one of the most influential TV shows ever on pop culture. Although no original episodes have been shot since, it has remained a regular feature on many station's schedules.

Still hoping for a Lost movie?

In a recent interview, Kevin Durand (who played Martin Keamy between 2008 and 2010) said he can't imagine a Lost reunion hitting the big screen. “I'd rather people go, ‘Oh, please! Please!’ than ‘I can't believe you did that. It was horrible.’”

Co-star William Mapother (who played Ethan Rom between 2004 and 2010) has also previously explained, “It would be terrible to do something and have it not be good,”. “It was so terrific ... If we did a Lost movie and it sucked, then it would, you know, blemish it.”

On the subject of whether there could be a Lost film, Terry O'Quinn stated : “I think it's a bit of a case of ‘the book is better than the movie’.”

What about a Lost reboot?

Recasting Lost for a modern reboot. Hollywood is known for remaking remakes of films or tv series and the studios might think it would be great to bring the story back with a new set of characters.

Be it in the form of a Lost reunion, a Lost movie, or a Lost reboot, if you had to start filming today, who would you cast in what role?

© 2022 MediaMass All rights reserved. Do not reproduce (even with permission).


page served in 0.093s (1,7)