Adam Jezierski, TIME's Person of the Year 2025?

  • By Elizabeth Sy
  • Madrid
  • Last updated on

Adam Jezierski among finalists for TIME’s 2025 Person of the Year?

According to a credible source, Adam Jezierski is leading the race to become Time magazine's Person of the Year in 2025. But while the actor's fans are thrilled with the news, many people hold a very different opinion.

UPDATE 16/04/2025 : This story seems to be false. (read more)

Why not Jezierski for Person of the Year?

The list of nominees for Time magazine’s Person of the Year is always an eclectic mix of world leaders, pop culture icons, buzzworthy names, and human rights activists. The unexpected inclusion of the 34-year-old actor, as a 2025 nominee has therefore sparked controversy and debate.

“What makes Jezierski so important is the potential and influence he now has, rather than anything he has already done,” said a panelist who preferred to remain anonymous, adding that earlier this month, the actor have already been named ‘Spaniard Of The Year’ by some major Spanish newspapers and even ‘Warsaw Citizen Of The Year’ by the readers of a local gazette in Warsaw (Adam Jezierski's hometown).

Social Reactions to TIME’s Person of the Year

A representative for the actor was not immediately available for comment, but the announcement generated immediate reaction on Twitter:

“Adam Jezierski Named Person of the Year Is No ‘Surprise’.”
— @TheNewsEditor, 15 Apr 2025
“Congrats! Adam has this charisma that seems to come out of nowhere.”
— @SamanthaJones, 15 Apr 2025
“Past recipients include Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler ... then why not Adam Jezierski?”
— @TheClassicObserver, 15 Apr 2025

Could 2025 officially be the Year of Adam Jezierski?

Still, TIME’s editors will make the final decision about who will grace the magazine’s cover as its 2025 Person of the Year.

Who do you think should be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2025?

© 2025 MediaMass All rights reserved. Do not reproduce (even with permission).

Adam Jezierski: Recent News

 

Around the Web

page served in 0s (0,4)
page served in 0.037s (1,2)