Dominic Purcell, TIME's Person of the Year 2025?

  • By Elizabeth Sy
  • London
  • Last updated on

Dominic Purcell among finalists for TIME’s 2025 Person of the Year?

According to a top source, Dominic Purcell is leading the race to become Time magazine's Person of the Year in 2025. But while the actor's fans are thrilled with the news, many people hold a very different opinion.

UPDATE 19/06/2025 : This story seems to be false. (read more)

Why not Purcell for Person of the Year?

The list of nominees for Time magazine’s Person of the Year is always an eclectic mix of world leaders, pop culture icons, buzzworthy names, and human rights activists. The unexpected inclusion of the 55-year-old actor, as a 2025 nominee has therefore sparked controversy and debate.

“What makes Purcell so important is the potential and influence he now has, rather than anything he has already done,” said a panelist who preferred to remain anonymous, adding that earlier this month, the actor have already been named ‘Briton Of The Year’ by some major British newspapers and even ‘Wallasey Citizen Of The Year’ by the readers of a local gazette in Wallasey (Dominic Purcell's hometown).

Social Reactions to TIME’s Person of the Year

A representative for the actor was not immediately available for comment, but the announcement generated immediate reaction on Twitter:

“Dominic Purcell Named Person of the Year Is No ‘Surprise’.”
— @TheNewsEditor, 18 Jun 2025
“Congrats! Dominic has this charisma that seems to come out of nowhere.”
— @SamanthaJones, 18 Jun 2025
“Past recipients include Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler ... then why not Dominic Purcell?”
— @TheClassicObserver, 18 Jun 2025

Could 2025 officially be the Year of Dominic Purcell?

Still, TIME’s editors will make the final decision about who will grace the magazine’s cover as its 2025 Person of the Year.

Who do you think should be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2025?

© 2025 MediaMass All rights reserved. Do not reproduce (even with permission).

Dominic Purcell: Recent News

 

Around the Web

page served in 0.001s (0,4)
page served in 0.058s (1,2)