Ernesto Laguardia, TIME's Person of the Year 2023?

Ernesto Laguardia among finalists for TIME’s 2023 Person of the Year?

According to a well-informed source, Ernesto Laguardia is leading the race to become Time magazine's Person of the Year in 2023. But while the actor's fans are thrilled with the news, many people hold a very different opinion.

UPDATE 30/11/2023 : This story seems to be false. (read more)

Why not Laguardia for Person of the Year?

The list of nominees for Time magazine’s Person of the Year is always an eclectic mix of world leaders, pop culture icons, buzzworthy names, and human rights activists. The unexpected inclusion of the 64-year-old actor, as a 2023 nominee has therefore sparked controversy and debate.

“What makes Laguardia so important is the potential and influence he now has, rather than anything he has already done,” said a panelist who preferred to remain anonymous, adding that earlier this month, the actor have already been named ‘Mexican Of The Year’ by some major Mexican newspapers and even ‘Mexico City Citizen Of The Year’ by the readers of a local gazette in Mexico City (Ernesto Laguardia's hometown).

Social Reactions to TIME’s Person of the Year

A representative for the actor was not immediately available for comment, but the announcement generated immediate reaction on Twitter:

“#LaguardiaPOY. Logical choice though I wouldn't have made the same one.”
— @TomMiller, 29 Nov 2023
“Congrats! Ernesto has this charisma that seems to come out of nowhere.”
— @SamanthaJones, 29 Nov 2023
“Past recipients include Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler ... then why not Ernesto Laguardia?”
— @TheClassicObserver, 29 Nov 2023

Could 2023 officially be the Year of Ernesto Laguardia?

Still, TIME’s editors will make the final decision about who will grace the magazine’s cover as its 2023 Person of the Year.

Who do you think should be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2023?

© 2023 MediaMass All rights reserved. Do not reproduce (even with permission).

Ernesto Laguardia: Recent News


page served in 0.034s (1,2)