Mary Elizabeth Winstead to be the next Bond Girl?

  • By Jim Leap
  • Washington
  • Last updated on

Mary Elizabeth Winstead to play a 40-year-old Bond Girl?

American star Mary Elizabeth Winstead is reportedly set to play the Bond girl in the next edition of “James Bond” franchise. The Internet is buzzing with rumors that the actress best known for her roles in Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter or Scott Pilgrim vs. the World could be cast as the female lead opposite Daniel Craig.

UPDATE 02/11/2024 : This story seems to be false. (read more)

The Oldest Bond girl ever

If she does sign on board Winstead, who is set to turn 40 next year, would technically become the oldest Bond girl in the franchise's history. Honor Blackman, the previous holder of that title, was 39 when she played Goldfinger's Pussy Galore opposite Sean Connery's 33-year-old 007 in 1964.

“The producers have tried to get Mary Elizabeth before, but she has never been available because of other commitments,” a source close to the production said about the actress. “The discussions have been going on for some time and they are working out the contract details now.”

This 'Winstead to play Bond Girl' Rumor had the internet in a frenzy

Twitter was flooded again Friday with loads of tweets related to the rumor. Some fans even launched an online Facebook page called We Want Mary Elizabeth Winstead for Bond Girl.

“She’ll be a great Bond girl. Bond girls are always brainy as well as sexy, and that’s totally Mary Elizabeth.”
— Sam Lopez (@slopezPR) November 1, 2024
“She was perfect as Mary Todd Lincoln in ‘Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter’, she will be tremendous portraying the iconic Bond girl role.”
— The Clear Observer (@clearobserver) November 1, 2024
“A 39-year-old Bond girl!?! Is it some kind of a joke?”
— Boris Kleinman (@UKBoris) November 1, 2024

Would you like to see Mary Elizabeth Winstead as the next Bond girl?

© 2024 MediaMass All rights reserved. Do not reproduce (even with permission).

Mary Elizabeth Winstead: Recent News

 

page served in 0.369s (1,3)