Prince Charles, TIME's Person of the Year 2020?

Prince of Wales among finalists for TIME’s 2020 Person of the Year?

According to a credible source, Prince of Wales Prince Charles is leading the race to become Time magazine's Person of the Year in 2020. But while the prince's fans are thrilled with the news, many people hold a very different opinion.

UPDATE 24/09/2020 : This story seems to be false. (read more)

Why not Prince Charles for Person of the Year?

The list of nominees for Time magazine’s Person of the Year is always an eclectic mix of world leaders, pop culture icons, buzzworthy names, and human rights activists. The unexpected inclusion of the 71-year-old prince, as a 2020 nominee has therefore sparked controversy and debate.

“What makes Prince Charles so important is the potential and influence he now has, rather than anything he has already done,” said a panelist who preferred to remain anonymous, adding that earlier this month, the prince have already been named ‘Briton Of The Year’ by some major British newspapers and even ‘Buckingham Palace Citizen Of The Year’ by the readers of a local gazette in Buckingham Palace (Prince Charles' hometown).

Social Reactions to TIME’s Person of the Year

A representative for the prince was not immediately available for comment, but the announcement generated immediate reaction on Twitter:

“#Prince CharlesPOY. Logical choice though I wouldn't have made the same one.”
— @TomMiller, 23 Sep 2020
“Congrats! Charles has this charisma that seems to come out of nowhere.”
— @SamanthaJones, 23 Sep 2020
“Past recipients include Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler ... then why not Prince Charles?”
— @TheClassicObserver, 23 Sep 2020

Could 2020 officially be the Year of Prince Charles?

Still, TIME’s editors will make the final decision about who will grace the magazine’s cover as its 2020 Person of the Year.

Who do you think should be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2020?

© 2020 MediaMass All rights reserved. Do not reproduce (even with permission).

Prince Charles: Recent News


page served in 0.042s (1,3)