Ryan Seacrest, TIME's Person of the Year 2020?

Ryan Seacrest among finalists for TIME’s 2020 Person of the Year?

According to a well-placed source, Ryan Seacrest is leading the race to become Time magazine's Person of the Year in 2020. But while the television host's fans are thrilled with the news, many people hold a very different opinion.

UPDATE 07/04/2020 : This story seems to be false. (read more)

Why not Seacrest for Person of the Year?

The list of nominees for Time magazine’s Person of the Year is always an eclectic mix of world leaders, pop culture icons, buzzworthy names, and human rights activists. The unexpected inclusion of the 45-year-old television host, as a 2020 nominee has therefore sparked controversy and debate.

“What makes Seacrest so important is the potential and influence he now has, rather than anything he has already done,” said a panelist who preferred to remain anonymous, adding that earlier this month, the television host have already been named ‘American Of The Year’ by some major American newspapers and even ‘Dunwoody Citizen Of The Year’ by the readers of a local gazette in Dunwoody (Ryan Seacrest's hometown).

Social Reactions to TIME’s Person of the Year

A representative for the television host was not immediately available for comment, but the announcement generated immediate reaction on Twitter:

“#SeacrestPOY. Logical choice though I wouldn't have made the same one.”
— @TomMiller, 6 Apr 2020
“Congrats! Ryan has this charisma that seems to come out of nowhere.”
— @SamanthaJones, 6 Apr 2020
“Past recipients include Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler ... then why not Ryan Seacrest?”
— @TheClassicObserver, 6 Apr 2020

Could 2020 officially be the Year of Ryan Seacrest?

Still, TIME’s editors will make the final decision about who will grace the magazine’s cover as its 2020 Person of the Year.

Who do you think should be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2020?

© 2020 MediaMass All rights reserved. Do not reproduce (even with permission).

Ryan Seacrest: Recent News


page served in 0.039s (1,3)