Victoria Principal, TIME's Person of the Year 2021?

Victoria Principal among finalists for TIME’s 2021 Person of the Year?

According to a reliable source, Victoria Principal is leading the race to become Time magazine's Person of the Year in 2021. But while the actress' fans are thrilled with the news, many people hold a very different opinion.

UPDATE 22/09/2021 : This story seems to be false. (read more)

Why not Principal for Person of the Year?

The list of nominees for Time magazine’s Person of the Year is always an eclectic mix of world leaders, pop culture icons, buzzworthy names, and human rights activists. The unexpected inclusion of the 71-year-old actress, as a 2021 nominee has therefore sparked controversy and debate.

“What makes Principal so important is the potential and influence she now has, rather than anything she has already done,” said a panelist who preferred to remain anonymous, adding that earlier this month, the actress have already been named ‘American Of The Year’ by some major American newspapers and even ‘Fukuoka Citizen Of The Year’ by the readers of a local gazette in Fukuoka (Victoria Principal's hometown).

Social Reactions to TIME’s Person of the Year

A representative for the actress was not immediately available for comment, but the announcement generated immediate reaction on Twitter:

“Victoria Principal Named Person of the Year Is No ‘Surprise’.”
— @TheNewsEditor, 21 Sep 2021
“Congrats! Victoria has this charisma that seems to come out of nowhere.”
— @SamanthaJones, 21 Sep 2021
“Past recipients include Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler ... then why not Victoria Principal?”
— @TheClassicObserver, 21 Sep 2021

Could 2021 officially be the Year of Victoria Principal?

Still, TIME’s editors will make the final decision about who will grace the magazine’s cover as its 2021 Person of the Year.

Who do you think should be TIME’s Person of the Year for 2021?

© 2021 MediaMass All rights reserved. Do not reproduce (even with permission).

Victoria Principal: Recent News


page served in 0.043s (1,2)